Fermatastheorem comments on Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality discussion thread, part 26, chapter 97 - Less Wrong

5 Post author: palladias 15 August 2013 02:18AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (501)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Fermatastheorem 22 August 2013 07:32:05PM 1 point [-]

Do you have an example of this happening?

Comment author: gattsuru 22 August 2013 08:10:10PM 6 points [-]

Ron's disguise in the book 7 Gringrotts break-in was a transfiguration (as contrasted to the polyjuice used by Hermoine), and explicitly removed by Thief's Downfall. It's not clear that Rational!Harry's transfiguration operates by the same rules as conventional ones, and could have been stored in some way to protect against exposure, but this provides both narrative and practical evidence against the theory.

I expect that point of the pen is to demonstrate to Lord Malfoy that a) Harry is a man of his word, and thus his words are worth examining, and b) Harry is a man of /exactly/ his word, and thus worth respecting.

Comment author: Fermatastheorem 23 August 2013 04:00:54AM 2 points [-]

Thank you!

Comment author: Velorien 23 August 2013 01:00:57PM 5 points [-]

I expect that point of the pen is to demonstrate to Lord Malfoy that a) Harry is a man of his word, and thus his words are worth examining, and b) Harry is a man of /exactly/ his word, and thus worth respecting.

It occurs to me that for a normal person "his words are worth examining" and "worth respecting" would be the other way round in that sentence.