I operate by Crocker's rules.
I try to not make people regret telling me things. So in particular:
- I expect to be safe to ask if your post would give AI labs dangerous ideas.
- If you worry I'll produce such posts, I'll try to keep your worry from making them more likely even if I disagree. Not thinking there will be easier if you don't spell it out in the initial contact.
Posts
Wikitag Contributions
What if you say that when it was fully accurate?
give me the guts!!1
don't polish them, just take a picture of your notes or something.
Congratulations on changing your mind!
It’s sorta suspicious that I only realized those now, after I officially dropped the project
You should try dropping your other idea and seeing if you come up with reasons that one is wrong too! And/or pick this one up again, then come up with reasons it's a good idea after all. In the spirit of "You can't know if something is a good idea until you resolve to do it"!
In general, I wish this year? (*checks* huh, only 4 months.) of planning this project had involved more empiricism. For example, you could've just checked whether a language model trained on ocean sounds can say what the animals are talking about.
3
1
1
1Hmm. Sounds like it was not enough capsaicin. Capsaicin will drive off bears, I hear. I guess you'd need gloves for food, or permanent gloves without the nail polish. Could you use one false nail as a chew toy?
Try mixing in capsaicin?
flavored nail polish?
Link an example, along with how cherry-picked it is?
To prepare for abundant cognition you can install a keylogger.
1
I just meant the "guts of the category theory" part. I'm concerned that anyone says that it should be contained (aka used but not shown), and hope it's merely that you'd expect to lose half the readers if you showed it. I didn't mean to add to your pile of work and if there is no available action like snapping a photo that takes less time than writing the reply I'm replying to did, then disregard me.