I operate by Crocker's rules.
I try to not make people regret telling me things. So in particular:
- I expect to be safe to ask if your post would give AI labs dangerous ideas.
- If you worry I'll produce such posts, I'll try to keep your worry from making them more likely even if I disagree. Not thinking there will be easier if you don't spell it out in the initial contact.
The idea would be that it isn't optimizing for virtue, it's taking the virtuous action, as in https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/LcjuHNxubQqCry9tT/vdt-a-solution-to-decision-theory.
Well, what does it say about the trolley problem?
You could reduce check-shutdown.sh to the ssh part and prevent-shutdown.sh to "run long-running-command using ssh".
I know less than you here, but last-minute flights are marked up because businesspeople sometimes need them and maybe TII/SC get a better price on those?
I'd have called this not a scam because it hands off the cost of delays to someone in a better position to avert the delays.
I just meant the "guts of the category theory" part. I'm concerned that anyone says that it should be contained (aka used but not shown), and hope it's merely that you'd expect to lose half the readers if you showed it. I didn't mean to add to your pile of work and if there is no available action like snapping a photo that takes less time than writing the reply I'm replying to did, then disregard me.
What if you say that when it was fully accurate?
give me the guts!!1
don't polish them, just take a picture of your notes or something.
Nah, that's still less obvious than asking.