Dorikka comments on Open thread, August 19-25, 2013 - Less Wrong

2 Post author: David_Gerard 19 August 2013 06:58AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (325)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Dorikka 19 August 2013 07:32:07PM *  9 points [-]

Open comment thread:

If it's worth saying, but not worth its own top-level comment in the open thread, it goes here.

(Copied since it was well received last time.)

Comment author: shminux 19 August 2013 08:22:55PM 5 points [-]

What's the name of the bias/fallacy/phenomenon where you learn something (new information, approach, calculation, way of thinking, ...) but after awhile revert to the old ideas/habits/views etc.?

Comment author: RobbBB 20 August 2013 06:12:53AM 10 points [-]

Relapse? Backsliding? Recidivism? Unstickiness? Retrogression? Downdating?

Comment author: shminux 20 August 2013 05:40:52PM *  0 points [-]

Hmm, some of these are good terms, but the issue is so common, I assumed there would be a standard term for it, at least in the education circles.

Comment author: moreati 19 August 2013 09:48:41PM 0 points [-]

I can't think of an academic name, the common phrases in Britain are 'stuck in your ways', 'bloody minded', 'better the the devil you know'.

Comment author: [deleted] 21 August 2013 06:09:19PM 0 points [-]

Depending on what timescales shminux is thinking of as “awhile” (hours or months?), RobbBB's suggestions may be better.

Comment author: Armok_GoB 27 August 2013 07:49:08PM 0 points [-]

Open subcomment subthread:

If it's not worth saying anywhere, it goes here.

Comment author: Dorikka 27 August 2013 11:54:07PM *  0 points [-]

I thought it wasn't necessary to paste the note (not mine) that accompanied the original comment. :P

Regarding the obvious recursion, please note that jokes are generally only funny the first time. :)

Comment author: Armok_GoB 28 August 2013 07:01:50PM 0 points [-]

Hey now, half the joke was sort of original, about the implication of sufficient metaleevels in this direction. :p