= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Gurkenglas comments on Types of recursion - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (16)
Maybe it's just that people don't expect the second structure or aren't used to it? I predict that exposing someone to 2. sufficiently will end the confusion.
Interesting. I wonder, are there natural languages - or communities - where the second structure is commonly used? If not, that may be evidence favoring a natural inclination towards (or ability to use) the first structure
This is how German language seems to me, but I don't speak German well, so if I am correct, could someone please provide an example of a similarly structured sentence, with a word-for-word translation to English?