Alejandro1 comments on Academic Cliques - Less Wrong

21 Post author: ChrisHallquist 08 November 2013 04:27AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (57)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Alejandro1 08 November 2013 02:09:54PM 2 points [-]

Here is a quick tip for seeing if the apparent academic consensus that says C on topic X is really just a clique: Find a review article on X that assumes C, with a lot of space dedicated to describing at length (and with many citations) all the work that has been done supporting C and building on it. If the C consensus is a clique and the review is minimally honest, it will probably have a small section describing a different perspective, with only one or two citations, which when tracked will prove to be review articles on X as long and impressive as the one you are reading but describing a non-C position.

Comment author: Eugine_Nier 09 November 2013 08:12:09AM 1 point [-]

If the C consensus is a clique and the review is minimally honest,

Some disciplines are so bad that this is not always a safe assumption.

Comment author: ChrisHallquist 08 November 2013 07:51:46PM 0 points [-]

If only review articles were more common in philosophy...