= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Eugine_Nier comments on Rationality Quotes January 2014 - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (186)
That's false. People frequently call things they can afford immoral.
I don't think anyone is claiming that this describes all instances where someone calls something immoral.
It's merely calling attention to two interesting phenomena: (1) envy can make people regard something as immoral when their real problem with it is that others can have it and they can't, and (2) even when someone has actual principled reasons for disapproving of something, once they are in a position to take advantage of it themselves they are liable to forget those principles.
(Perhaps those are really the same phenomenon, deep down. But they feel different enough that, e.g., it took me a while to figure out how anyone could think the quotation had anything to do with the idea that "power corrupts" because I was initially thinking only of #1 while cousin_it was referring to #2.)
Let's say X is an action that's immoral in some sense and profitable in some sense. There are three variables:
1) Do I say it's immoral to do X?
2) Can I do X at a low cost to myself?
3) Is it "actually" immoral to do X?
"Power corrupts" says that 1 and 2 are anticorrelated when 3 is true. The quote I posted says that 1 and 2 are anticorrelated regardless of the value of 3, because people just do a cost-benefit calculation. That seems to cover both of your scenarios as well.
(You may or may not interpret that as saying that people don't care about 3, which sounds pretty cynical but seems to be true in some cases.)
The OP doesn't state that people don't call things they can afford immoral. Only that people do call things they can't afford immoral.
The OP says they will stop calling it immoral once they can afford it.
Only this particular thing.