Curiouskid comments on Division of cognitive labour in accordance with researchers' ability - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (68)
If you haven't already, you should read Michael Nielsen's posts on open science. His book "Reinventing Discovery" has been discussed on LW before. Also, the polymath wiki has a lot of different posts on improving science.
There are lots of other resources on improving science that I've come across (and am still synthesizing). I think the links above are the best writings I've found on the subject.
Another interesting link.
Science Hostels:
EDIT: Here's a link to another related LW post.
Many thanks for the links! I did read some of Nielsen's stuff yesterday (via a link someone else posted here), which I find very interesting. I'll continue to look into this.
This stuff is very important: as Bostrom points out in this article - http://www.nickbostrom.com/views/science.pdf - you can probably do more for the world if you're a really succesful "meta-scientists" (who improves the methods or institutions of science) than you can do if you're a really succesful "first-order scientist" (e.g. physicist). Given that the present institutions of science are far from ideal, as I see it, there is much room for improvement here.
Science hostels - what a lovely idea! :)