private_messaging comments on 2013 Survey Results - Less Wrong

74 Post author: Yvain 19 January 2014 02:51AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (558)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: private_messaging 09 September 2014 04:53:15AM *  1 point [-]

but in repelling the lower IQ people.

The time on LW correlated negatively with IQ... (and getting the high IQ people to come is difficult). You don't get to invite the whole world.

Note further that I was taking the 146 number as the highest reported estimate, to get the most "implausible" number, which was a mere 1/1000, and not really that rare.

It is still rarer than many other things, e.g. extremely overinflated self assessment is not very rare.

The 2013 survey had 138, which is 1/177, which is thoroughly unexciting as implausibly rare snowflakes.

Well, yeah.

Is that documented for the 146+ crowd?

One can always special plead their ways out of any data. There's two types of IQ score, one of them is about mental age, by the way.

Comment author: Vaniver 09 September 2014 02:03:45PM *  0 points [-]

The time on LW correlated negatively with IQ... (and getting the high IQ people to come is difficult).

I thought we discovered this was driven by outliers in people who spent very little time on LW. (I'm on my phone, or I would check.)

Comment author: buybuydandavis 10 September 2014 10:53:41PM 0 points [-]

Do you have any recollections on the source for that discovery?

Is the full survey data available, so that we could look at the distribution?

Comment author: Vaniver 11 September 2014 02:42:26AM 0 points [-]

Yes; the OP has a link to the 2013 survey data in the last line. Also note survey results for 2012, 2011, and 2009. Here's my comment on this year's describing what happened last year, and while this is relevant I have a memory of looking at the data, making a graph, and calling it 'trapzeoidal,' but I don't know where that is, and I don't see the image uploaded where I probably would have uploaded it- so I guess I never published that analysis. Anyway, I recommend you take a look at it yourself.

Comment author: private_messaging 10 September 2014 11:41:00AM *  0 points [-]

Dunno, maybe. In any case 'repelling lower IQ people' hypothesis seems like it ought to yield a corresponding correlation between IQ and participation, but the opposite or no correlation is observed. (albeit the writing clarity here is quite seriously low - using private terminology instead of existing words, etc. which many may find annoying and perhaps inaccessible)