nshepperd comments on A Fervent Defense of Frequentist Statistics - Less Wrong

43 Post author: jsteinhardt 18 February 2014 08:08PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (125)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: nshepperd 19 February 2014 05:04:50PM 3 points [-]

Did you mean to say continuous bijections? Obviously adding two points wouldn't change the cardinality of an infinite set, but "easy to compute" might change.

Comment author: labachevskij 21 February 2014 09:52:50AM 1 point [-]

You're right, I meant continuous bijections, as the context was a transformation of a probability distribution.