= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
blake8086 comments on A simple game that has no solution - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (123)
I don't think your game is sequential, if Player 2 doesn't know Player 1's move.
You really have two games:
Game 1: Sequential game of Player 1 chooses A or B/C, and determines whether game 2 occurs.
Game 2: Simultaneous game of Player 2 maybe choosing X or Y, against Player 1's unknown selection of B/C.
edit: And the equilibrium case for Player 1 in the second game is an expected payout of 2, so he should always choose A.