Ritalin comments on Open thread, Dec. 1 - Dec. 7, 2014 - Less Wrong

3 Post author: MrMind 01 December 2014 08:29AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (346)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Ritalin 07 December 2014 06:10:14PM 3 points [-]

Court OKs Barring High IQs for Cops

An aspiring cop got rejected for scoring too high on an IQ test.

I cannot begin to understand why they would do that.

Comment author: gjm 07 December 2014 09:33:56PM 0 points [-]

It may be worth mentioning that the article appears to be from 14 years ago. (Or it may not; for all I know the same policy is still in place.)

Comment author: bramflakes 07 December 2014 08:07:47PM 0 points [-]

I went into the article thinking the guy would have a freakishly high IQ (160+) where I could maybe see the point, but instead was 125. The judges most likely scored higher than that - aren't they feeling even slightly belittled at the suggestion that they'd be ineligible for law enforcement work because they'd find it too boring?

Comment author: MathiasZaman 07 December 2014 07:28:16PM 0 points [-]

The weird part is that after being rejected as a police officer he goes off to work as a prison guard. The latter is way more boring. If he's able to put up with that, he should be able to cope with the boredom of law enforcement.

Comment author: skeptical_lurker 07 December 2014 07:11:10PM *  0 points [-]

Their explanation is that he would get bored and leave. I'm not surprised - I've been rejected for jobs more than once due to being too smart. (I'm not just boasting, it does seem relevant)