Stuart_Armstrong comments on Defining a limited satisficer - Less Wrong

6 Post author: Stuart_Armstrong 11 March 2015 02:23PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (11)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Stuart_Armstrong 12 March 2015 10:59:42AM 1 point [-]

If the satisficer is fine with "make 10 paperclips", but the difference between that and "make 10 paperclips and kill all humans" is small, the satisficer may well go with whatever showed up first in its search algorithm.

Yep, that's the problem. That's why I'm trying to address the issue directly by penalising things like "...and kill all humans".