D_Malik comments on Open Thread, Apr. 27 - May 3, 2015 - Less Wrong

3 Post author: Gondolinian 27 April 2015 12:18AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (352)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: D_Malik 28 April 2015 04:02:00AM *  2 points [-]

Is transcranial direct current stimulation technology yet at the point where someone who starts it has higher expected gains than costs? I.e., should more LWers be using it? You can comment and/or answer this poll:

Do you think the average LWer would get a net benefit from using tDCS, taking into account the benefits, costs of equipment, risks, etc.?

Net loss Net benefit
How much do you know about this topic?
Nothing Expert

Summary of the 2008 state of the art; tDCS subreddit.

Submitting...

Comment author: D_Malik 30 April 2015 04:36:18AM *  3 points [-]

Probably gotten most of the responses it was going to get, so here's a scatter plot:

People seem to think it's worse the more they know about it (except those who know nothing seem slightly more pessimistic than those who know only a little).

Made by running this in IPython (after "import pandas as pd" and "from numpy.random import randn" in .pythonstartup):

!sed "/^#/d" poll.csv >poll-clean.csv
pd.read_csv("poll-clean.csv", names=["user", "pollid", "response", "date"])
_.pivot_table("response", ["user"], ["pollid"])
_ + 0.1*randn(*_.shape) # jitter
_.plot(kind="scatter", x=906, y=907)
plt.xlabel("Net loss.....Net benefit")
plt.ylabel("Nothing.....Expert")
Comment author: Manfred 29 April 2015 08:41:25AM 0 points [-]

Ooh, having the raw poll data is neat.