RowanE comments on Open Thread, Apr. 27 - May 3, 2015 - Less Wrong

3 Post author: Gondolinian 27 April 2015 12:18AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (352)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: RowanE 28 April 2015 01:13:57PM 3 points [-]

That really sounds like just fighting the hypothetical. I mean, in practice, if something approximating the experiment was attempted in the real world, your reasoning is right, but that's not at all what the thought experiment is about. Do you at least acknowledge that, given that the people involved don't know about it (and also won't find out about the torture later), torture is the correct option?

Comment author: [deleted] 28 April 2015 03:21:29PM *  2 points [-]

Do you at least acknowledge that, given that the people involved don't know about it (and also won't find out about the torture later), torture is the correct option?

This is pretty hard to answer. For moral / ethical questions, I don't want to get "pure math" but also rely on intuitions, and I cannot really rely on my intuitions here as they are very much social. As in, immoral is what horrifies a lot of people. I don't really know how to approach it without relying on such intuitions. Surely I can calculate the total sum of utils but how does that quantitative and descriptive approach turn into a qualitative and prescriptive worse/better? I am not at all sure worse entirely equals the result of a utility calculation. It is not unrelated to it either, of course, my basic intuition - that wrong is whatever horrifies a lot of people - does of course correlate to utility as well.

I mean, what else is morality if not some sort of a social condemnation or approval?

Comment author: RowanE 28 April 2015 04:24:03PM 0 points [-]

If what you really care about is people condemning or approving, shouldn't you actually be optimising for that instead of "utils"?