I don't see that reference.

That's because you read the post without the context. This post includes the sentence "Referring to the story I linked below about the male virgins in Silicon Valley, I doubt that they wound up that way because of christian upbringings. "

That post refers to a 40 year old virgin.

Null. Improving one's sex life requires having a sex life in the first place, the absence of which is rather central to his comment/post.

Then you just contradicted yourself. You wrote "atheism is "sold" to young men and women as a way to improve their sex lives"