= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
ike comments on Don't You Care If It Works? - Part 1 - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (58)
No. Your calibration is still perfect if your priors are perfect. You can only get to that "99% chance of getting strong evidence for hypothesis" if you're already very sure of that hypothesis math here