NancyLebovitz comments on Open thread, Oct. 5 - Oct. 11, 2015 - Less Wrong

7 Post author: MrMind 05 October 2015 06:50AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (346)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 06 October 2015 08:28:30PM 6 points [-]

You care about false upvoting a great deal more than I do.

Is it worth mentioning that I was kinder to aa than most of the people who replied to him?

Check out the discussion at SlateStarCodex about banning Steve Johnson, a time-wasting fellow who wasn't quite breaking the rules.

Comment author: polymathwannabe 07 October 2015 04:05:42PM 2 points [-]

I was kinder to aa than most of the people who replied to him

I really want to hope I can say the same. I sort of took it as my personal mission to respond to every outrageous thing he said, and point out the problems with his politics and his theory of sexuality. As a former member of the online incel community, I thought I was in a better position to empathize with his situation, and could present alternative arguments in a way that he might be more receptive to than standard refutation. But AA never replied directly to me, so I don't know how he took my approach.

Comment author: bogus 06 October 2015 09:04:44PM 2 points [-]

Check out the discussion at SlateStarCodex about banning Steve Johnson, a time-wasting fellow who wasn't quite breaking the rules.

SlateStarCodex does not have a karma system, though.On LW, time wasters tend to be downvoted swiftly, so they don't really waste much time anyway. If someone who's broadly considered a "time-waster" is nonetheless upvoted, this tells me that what they're posting is unusually interesting.

Comment author: username2 06 October 2015 09:12:20PM 3 points [-]

You can have a voting ring.

Comment author: ChristianKl 06 October 2015 09:24:05PM 3 points [-]

On LW, time wasters tend to be downvoted swiftly, so they don't really waste much time anyway.

In this case AA's post got downvoted swiftly but still wasted a lot of energy.