ChristianKl comments on Rationality Merchandise - First Set - Less Wrong

11 Post author: Gleb_Tsipursky 05 November 2015 06:12AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (85)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: ChristianKl 09 November 2015 09:00:06PM 0 points [-]

Why do you say a ring is not practical?

I don't think that rings are good for blood flow in the finger. Espeically one's big enough to display a logo.

Comment author: Lumifer 09 November 2015 09:04:32PM 2 points [-]

I don't think that rings are good for blood flow in the finger.

Most women I know wear at least one ring, often more. Their fingers haven't fallen off and don't look to be blood-starved. Most married men wear a ring. Their fingers look fine, too.

Comment author: Morendil 09 November 2015 11:10:26PM 0 points [-]

Whatever happened to looking for evidence?

Comment author: Lumifer 10 November 2015 02:52:06AM 3 points [-]

Evidence should be relevant to the claim. The claim was "[not] good for blood flow in the finger". The original claim before that was that "[w]earing a ring is not particularly practical". None of these two claims seem to be anywhere close to to reality.

Comment author: Gleb_Tsipursky 12 November 2015 10:26:13PM -1 points [-]

Please help optimize the designs of the t-shirts - more in this post. Thanks!

Comment author: Lumifer 12 November 2015 10:33:21PM 1 point [-]

Please don't spam the same comment to different threads.

Comment author: ChristianKl 09 November 2015 09:12:55PM 0 points [-]

Most women I know wear at least one ring, often more. Their fingers haven't fallen off and don't look to be blood-starved.

That's a strawman. I didn't claim that it makes finger fall off.

Comment author: Lumifer 09 November 2015 09:14:43PM 2 points [-]

So what is it exactly that you are claiming?

Comment author: ChristianKl 09 November 2015 09:51:53PM 0 points [-]

Likely smaller range of effective movement. Woman wears a lot of rings just as they wear high heels that are also not ergonomic.

Seeking around I find studies that show that rings are very unhygenic for hospital stuff but not much investigation beyond that.

Comment author: Lumifer 09 November 2015 10:04:34PM *  3 points [-]

Likely smaller range of effective movement.

Umm... no.

Just like with the "blood flow", I think you're imagining things.

Rings are certainly inconvenient when you're doing some things with your hands, but it's not because they restrict the range of finger movement.

Comment author: Gleb_Tsipursky 12 November 2015 09:36:25PM -1 points [-]

Rings are certainly inconvenient when you're doing some things with your hands

I just have this urge to say this, and I think I'll go ahead: that's what she said

Comment author: Gleb_Tsipursky 12 November 2015 09:35:42PM -1 points [-]

Rings are certainly inconvenient when you're doing some things with your hands

I just have this urge to say this, and I think I'll go ahead: that's what she said

Comment author: Pancho_Iba 10 November 2015 01:17:13PM 0 points [-]

I have worn 3 rings in my life. The first one broke; it was made of coconut. The second one, I lost it. The third one was uncomfortable.

None of those prejudiced my blood flow. Now, I'm obviously not saying that no ring will do this, but that we would only need to pick a proper one. The second ring I mentioned was roughly 5mm wide, which is enough space to write LessWrong on it.