NancyLebovitz comments on Open thread, Jan. 18 - Jan. 24, 2016 - Less Wrong

4 Post author: MrMind 18 January 2016 09:42AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (201)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 19 January 2016 10:10:26AM *  2 points [-]

Sparks of Genius has a lot of challenges for the imagination. What geometrical figure has a circular cross section and a square cross section? Circular, square, and triangular cross sections?

Comment author: Gunnar_Zarncke 19 January 2016 08:55:27PM 1 point [-]

That book looks interesting. Added it to my wish list. Here is a summary: http://vnthomas1.blogspot.de/2009/06/sparks-of-genius-13-thinking-tools-of.html

Comment author: Gunnar_Zarncke 19 January 2016 07:21:04PM 1 point [-]

We talked about 3D objects being square from one side and circle from the other - for example a cylinder. But he rejected this approach (though he was able to visualize the form). He considered taking circle and square apart and putting it back together into something like a rounded square but rejected that too as neither square nor circle.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 19 January 2016 07:44:37PM 1 point [-]

My guess is that your son doesn't have a solid grasp of the idea of a cross section. Actually, I don't quite feel good about a cylinder having a square cross section. It's as though it's wrong to neglect the idea that a cylinder is round.

Comment author: Vaniver 20 January 2016 04:57:23PM 3 points [-]

Actually, I don't quite feel good about a cylinder having a square cross section.

Consider a square in front of you with its edges horizontal and vertical. (Say, drawn on your monitor.) Then consider the line running from the top of the square to the bottom of the square that passes through the center of the square. What happens when you rotate the square around that line?

Comment author: Gunnar_Zarncke 19 January 2016 08:49:48PM 0 points [-]

That was also my first impression. But we talked about it a bit longer. I think it clicked when he mentioned how he looked (in imagination) at the form such that the top becomes a straight line (like looking a paper from the side) and the same with the bottom.

Comment author: moridinamael 19 January 2016 03:28:29PM 0 points [-]

I think your link didn't happen correctly.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 19 January 2016 04:18:07PM 0 points [-]

Thanks for letting me know.