Good_Burning_Plastic comments on Open thread, Jan. 18 - Jan. 24, 2016 - Less Wrong

4 Post author: MrMind 18 January 2016 09:42AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (201)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Good_Burning_Plastic 27 January 2016 07:16:17PM 2 points [-]

Comments by The Lion show up on his overview page but no longer in their original context (the permalinks say "There doesn't seem to be anything here.") What gives? In particular, that of 27 January 2016 02:16:08AM turned my inbox icon red but didn't show up in my inbox, which confused me.

Comment author: polymathwannabe 29 January 2016 01:43:42AM *  0 points [-]

He has now created a new username, The Lion 2, to repost his old posts and threaten the moderators.

Edited to add: As of now, he has gathered 65 karma points (87% positive) in less than a full day.

Comment author: Zubon 29 January 2016 08:34:27PM 0 points [-]

That seems like really sloppy sockpuppetry. Wouldn't that just tell admins which other accounts are likely also the same person, so ban the lot of them?

Comment author: Vaniver 29 January 2016 08:37:24PM 1 point [-]

Let's not publicly discuss flaws in plans to evade admin action.

Comment author: Lumifer 29 January 2016 08:56:54PM *  2 points [-]

Why not?

I am not buying this argument in the context of national security, why in the world would it apply here? I didn't pinky swear to uphold the power of moderators.

Besides, it's not like we're talking about non-obvious things.

Comment author: Vaniver 29 January 2016 09:35:26PM *  0 points [-]

I am not buying this argument in the context of national security, why in the world would it apply here?

There's an asymmetry between discussing flaws in the admin's plans and discussing flaws in the attacker's plans, which is significant enough that the first can be a public service and the second a public disservice.

The national security analog of the former is pointing out security holes, and the analog of the latter is giving helpful advice to terrorists.

Besides, it's not like we're talking about non-obvious things.

If it is truly obvious, then there is nothing to be gained by saying it; if it is not obvious, then there is something lost by saying it.

Comment author: Lumifer 29 January 2016 09:44:15PM 0 points [-]

There's an asymmetry between discussing flaws in the admin's plans and discussing flaws in the attacker's plan

Not quite, the defence and the attack are a matching zero-sum pair. Aiding one disadvantages the other.

The national security analog of the former is pointing out security holes, and the analog of the latter is giving helpful advice to terrorists.

Pointing out security holes is routinely called "giving helpful advice to terrorists" (or other members of the unholy triad, child pornographers and drug dealers).

Comment author: polymathwannabe 27 January 2016 07:42:09PM *  -1 points [-]

I opened a dozen permalinks of replies to his comments, then clicked the upward "Parent" link, and all of them showed "Comment deleted." Someone has been systematically deleting his comments.