Viliam comments on Open Thread April 4 - April 10, 2016 - Less Wrong

5 Post author: Elo 04 April 2016 04:56AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (211)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Elo 04 April 2016 08:46:23AM *  2 points [-]

user account: "Lamp" is banned for being eugine_nier. This is an update in case anyone was wondering.

so far accounts have been:

  • Eugine_Nier
  • Azazoth123
  • The_Lion
  • The_Lion2
  • Old_Gold
  • Lamp

(that I know of, I think there were more in between too that I forgot.)

If I could send this guy a message it would be this: You are quite literally wasting our time. And by "our" I mean; the moderators and the people who could be spending their time improving the place, coding and implementing a better place; instead are spending their time getting rid of you over and over. DON'T COME BACK. You are literally killing LW.

I don't want to get into the community's time or the time of the people you debate with; or the time of anyone who reads this post here. That time also adds up. Seriously.

Comment author: Dagon 04 April 2016 03:40:20PM 12 points [-]

If one banned troll (and AFAIK, we only have one who's bothering to come back, and doing so badly enough to get caught repeatedly) is enough to kill LW, we're in pretty bad shape.

Thanks to the mods for continuing to remove his accounts, but please try not to spend any more thought on him than you feel is beneficial.

Comment author: Lumifer 04 April 2016 02:46:59PM *  8 points [-]

You're getting dramatic for no good reason. I don't think that in reality people didn't submit patches because they were too busy with Eugine. Just didn't happen.

You are literally killing LW

Nope. Availability bias is a fallacy. Eugine is a very minor problem for LW.

Comment author: ChristianKl 05 April 2016 01:49:52AM 1 point [-]

You're getting dramatic for no good reason. I don't think that in reality people didn't submit patches because they were too busy with Eugine.

Elo isn't talking in the past tense. At moment there are people working on LW 2.0.

Comment author: Lumifer 05 April 2016 02:09:33AM 1 point [-]

Elo isn't talking in the past tense.

I don't think that in reality people don't submit patches because they are too busy with Eugine.

Happy?

Comment author: moridinamael 04 April 2016 04:09:20PM 0 points [-]

Nope. Availability bias is a fallacy. Eugine is a very minor problem for LW.

Feeling a bit left out that I haven't been targeted for mass downvoting.

Comment author: Error 07 April 2016 07:39:45PM 3 points [-]

Note that there is now a Lamp2. Going by the quoted parts of this subthread, he appears to be reposting his own deleted comments verbatim.

I'm a sometime admin. Ban evasion irritates me.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 04 April 2016 04:45:22PM *  0 points [-]

I'm not sure Eugine is sucking up nearly that much moderator time. I expect his bigoted comments do more damage because we're likely to lose some good commenters.

Comment author: Viliam 07 April 2016 11:32:37AM *  2 points [-]

I suspect the number of potential good commenters who were discouraged by participation by mass-downvoting after having posted their first five or ten comments might exceed all the other damage done by Eugine. (I don't have the relevant data, though, only anecdotal evidence.) Please note that this is Eugine's explicitly stated goal.

The moderators' time wasted is not so big in absolute numbers, but LW is quite self-moderated, so there is only minimum action that needs to be done directly by the mods. However, from that small amount of direct action, I would guess that maybe a half is Eugine-related (maybe except the recent "LessWrong 2.0" planned changes). It can be quite frustrating to become a part-time Eugine's babysitter.

Comment author: gjm 04 April 2016 03:47:01PM -1 points [-]

"Lamp" is banned for being eugine_nier.

Interesting. "Lamp"'s style came across to me as one notch less obnoxious than the other Eugine accounts I know of. (In addition to your list there's at least VoiceOfRa, Torchlight_Crimson and The_Bird.) But I take it there's good evidence it's him. (And I approve of terminating his accounts rapidly and with extreme prejudice when they are found.)

Comment author: Gurkenglas 04 April 2016 10:37:09AM *  1 point [-]

Would they have used their time improving LWs code? I feel like the problems it has would be solved by way less programmer-time than has been lost by LW being not improved, but nobody's doing it because procrastination/it isn't fun/akrasia/ugh fields.