My 11-year-old son had homework on how to be more compassionate. Rather than doing the homework he decided to donate (and tell the teacher that he was donating) $25 to the against Malaria foundation.
While that's part of the goal of the assignment it likely wasn't the only goal. If he was supposed to write an essay on the topic of "how to be more compassionate" he was likely also supposed to train essay writing.
The teacher apparently didn't like it, and found it disrespectful. Overall, however, she is a good teacher.
Just musing on how LW has had a profound impact on my life. It was a strong influence in my deconversion from theism, it's helped me make significant medical decisions, and I'm in love with someone I met at a LessWrong meetup, as well as another person whose first interaction with me was a Bayes theorem joke.
Seeking help with Voronoi map generation
I'm hoping somebody here can help me create a particular map. I'd like to build a weighted Voronoi map of North America, with the weights corresponding to each urban area's population. Or, put another way, I'd like to start with http://lpetrich.org/Science/GeometryDemo/GeometryDemo_GMap.html , input the urban areas listed at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_urban_areas_by_population , and then tweak how the map is produced so that if one metroplex has a population of 1,000,000 and another has 10,000,000, the border between them is about 90% of the way closer to the smaller city.
I'm trying to build a scifi setting to put a story in, and have certain suspicions about what such a map would look like, but would like to confirm my intuition. I'm running Fedora Linux, and don't mind compiling oddball software, I just don't know which packages I'd need to even try to generate this thing.
By any chance, anyone here already able to generate the final product with just a few mouse-clicks? :) If not, anyone have any advice on how to get started?
Homestuck has just joined HPMOR, Ra, Pact and TNC in the pantheon of "geek epic" stories with underwhelming endings :-(
As far as I know, only Worm and Undertale have managed to beat that curse so far.
Rust, a video game, has a veil of ignorance
After you've had a character for a while, gender is imposed randomly and permanently.
While I don't play Rust, my impression is that the devs are being dicks (heh) for what looks to be ideological reasons. They say:
"Technically nothing has changed, since half the population was already living with those feelings. The only difference is that whether you feel like this is now decided by your SteamID instead of your real life gender."
They are wrong, of course, what changed was that there was no choice possible and now there is a choice (which they dangle in front of you and then deny to you).
I agree with the assessment of Good_Burning_Plastic and Lumifer that user vision is Eugine redivivus yet again.
Have our esteemed moderators taken a look at what accounts are upvoting all Eugine's comments (across his multiple identities)? If, as has often been suggested, Eugine is getting most of his upvotes from sockpuppets then disabling those might be somewhat effective in making it harder for each of Eugine's accounts to start mass-downvoting before getting banhammered.
I think you misunderstood their comment. They aren't raging proponents of "transgenderism" whatever you seem to think that means.
They were saying that women (50% of the population) were being forced to play as guys when they played Rust.
R.A. MacAvoy on talking with imaginary people
Is it really a tulpa if you win all the arguments?
Top rated questions on the new prediction website metaculus:
Will 2016 be the warmest year on record?
Will a clinical trial begin by the end of 2017 using CRISPR to genetically modify a living human?
Will an AI successfully masquerade as human for 20 questions by 2017?
Has a new boson been discovered at the LHC?
Will Lockheed Martin and Skunkworks announce a successful test of a break-even compact fusion reactor by late 2019?
Skills are learned through training. Metaculus is a good way to train to estimate the future.
Sorry for mindkilling content, but I remember reading on LW long ago that the political left is supposedly morally different, because it doesn't use the "purity/disgust" moral axis.
Then I found these photos online, and I wonder whether that is the microexpression (except there seems to be nothing "micro" when these people do it) of disgust. Or am I reading the expression wrong?
My point is that if someone has this expression pretty much stuck on their face, I find it quite difficult to believe that they don't care about the "purity/...
Is the hypothesis about the political left not using the "purity/disgust" axis wrong?
It is wrong. Or, rather, the original hypothesis was about which axis dominates in political discourse and yes, purity/disgust does not dominate, but it is not completely absent either.
A clear example of the left doing the purity/disgust axis is environmentalism, opposition to GMOs, organic food, etc.
are their expressions very unrepresentative of their usual behavior?
If I take a few dozen pictures of one person talking, I can find in them most any microexpression you want including ridiculous ones. These expressions are not representative of anything.
By the way, there is Kling's three-axis model and there is Haidt's moral foundations model. They are different.
And the people were probably selected for being easily displayed in a bad light.
I just did a totally scientific experiment. I determined a perfectly fair and unbiased sample of leading names in social justice by (1) thinking what names come to mind when I think about "SJ" or "feminism" and (2) putting "leading advocate of social justice" into Google. I then looked for pictures of the resulting people (once again, Google is my friend).
In the resulting images, there were maybe one or two wearing something a bit like that sourly-disapproving expression, and none anywhere near as bad as in the image you linked to. Which, by the way, doesn't seem to name the people whose pictures it's showing; are they in fact prominent SJ people?
So I don't know how much is selection of people and how much is selection of photos, but I'm pretty sure that that facial expression is not in fact "The Face of Social Justice" in any useful sense.
I don't think there is that implication here.
The funny thing is looking at the responsible party. Just who is responsible for releasing a game where your character could only be male and no female option was available?
Why, I think the devs are women-haters! X-)
1. Validity of altruism
...Lesons from India
People self reported money and jobs as more important than health
Quite a few times we asked impoverished people what they most desired or what they thought would improve their happiness most. The most common answer we got was the desire for employment or a better job. People's happiness seemed to vary a lot depending on their job and it also came up a lot in general conversations. The second and third most common things we heard were money and food. We almost never heard about health issues or loss of family member
Misc
Transference: explains the relationship that failed to take after she said I 'felt' like one of the her ex's in Hong Kong, but then I emphasize that 'I'm different', explicit.
Paternalism
...In the southern United States before the Civil War, paternalism was a concept used to justify the legitimacy of slavery. Women would present themselves as mothers for the slaves, or protectors that provided benefits the slaves would not get on their own. Plantation mistresses would attempt to civilize their workers by providing food, shelter, and affection. These wome
Parenting/Housing
I have been playing with the thought of instead of buying a house for a big family, maybe I should buy a small land/house for me and my potential fiancee, and seperate lands/houses for my children.
At what age would you be confident that your child could handle living alone-ish?
I plan to have a large family (this is coming from a childless person, so make of it what you will, but I am entertaining the idea of double digits...so what this means in practice, is that their number probably won't be bottlenecked by my willingness, and thus, the ...
Past surveys show that most LessWrongers are consequentialists, and many are also effective altruism advocates. What do they think of infinities in ethics?
As I've intuitively always favoured some kind of negative utilitarianism, this has caused me some confusion.
Counterfactual Diaspora Question:
If Eliezer had written on OvercomingBias and gotten enough activity to create LessWrong, but the population was filled with different personalities (no So8res, no AnnaSalamon, no Yvain, etc.) do you think the diaspora would have occurred in the same way and on the same general timeframe that it has?
I' m curious about what parts of LessWrong's development you think were inevitable and why.
Ethics question:
Apple introduced http://www.techinsider.io/iphone-night-shift-blue-light-affects-your-brain-and-body-2016-4 . If Apple would have information about the sleeping habits of it's users via the Apple Watch. Would it be ethical for Apple to use that health data to inform decisions about how it doesn f.lux style color changes? Would it be ethical if it uses other information from the Care Kit for that decision without explicitely asking for it (of course the terms of condidtions that noboby reads would include information)?
Especially in the conte...
So I was wondering what career is best in terms of being able to accumulate wealth and having a decent quality of life. I've heard finance jobs are good.
For the purposes of completely illustrating the relative merits of this criterion based approach in comparison to the contributor guarantor model, it may be more efficacious to identify the general form of authorship problems than attempt to exhaust every conceivable existing and potential problem. This is because the contributor-guarantor model addresses all the challenges that individual criterion based guidelines are established to address – the asymmetrical standards between readers as to the interpretation of authorship assignment and order. Authorshi...
4. Karma policy
I used to have a 50% positive/negative karma target (0 net karma).
Recently a LW user (feel free to identify yourself if you want to be known and not if you don't) asked about my former karma policy. I don't currently have a karma policy.
That user suggested I make a post about it, so here it is with answers to their questions:
Begin:
Thank you for your interest.
aim for 50%
Last evening I edited my wikipage (a couple of hours before you sent this) to edit out that line. It takes time for the wiki page to update. Did that edit play a role in ...
I don't think it's that the community got used to your mental illness posts, it's that the lack of focus and high quantity got on people's nerves. Now that you aren't doing that, you aren't getting as much negative karma.
While I'm hoping that no one posts in the future with so much lack of focus, I think that if someone does, they will get at least as much negative karma.
4. Karma policy
I used to have a 50% positive/negative karma target (0 net karma).
Recently a LW user (feel free to identify yourself if you want to be known and not if you don't) asked about my former karma policy. I don't currently have a karma policy.
That user suggested I make a post about it, so here it is with answers to their questions:
Begin:
Thank you for your interest.
aim for 50%
Last evening I edited my wikipage (a couple of hours before you sent this) to edit out that line. It takes time for the wiki page to update. Did that edit play a role in bringing this to your attention?
I am wondering whether that may actually be the way to get the most of ones contributions.
Sorry, I am confident that I understand your wonder.
If you are interested in whether my karmic attitude can help understand my writing better than unequivocally yes. The higher my karma, the more I intentionally challenge the craft's community in ways that I expect are high impact, and neglected because the system of karma incentive that most users play by promoted conformity. A garden of roses is easier to maintain, yes, but a garden of roses with a couple of orchid's is lot more fun.
developed any specific techniques and whether you might write a post or Open Thread comment about it
One useful technique has been introducing cultural taboos. For instance, in the early days I would tip my hat at mental health issues and would be savaged for that. After months of inoculating the community, I can and have talked about my personal sex life in open threads without repercussion. When I notice pockets of conervatism, progressivism, or another ideological swing (libertarianism notably) that is other-than-radically-evidence-or-logic-based I see an opportunity to destabalise that and my intuition is that I have had an effect on the community
Keep up the learning maximizing!
You really got these questions in the nick of time. I will not tell you why I am going ghost on this (not on my wiki anymore) I'll post an open-thread comment about it since I have mentioned it in a thread before. I looked for it just now to show you without fortune. In summary, users were uniformly against the idea. However, I posted it in a thread were the general sentiment was we can use karma to infer yada yada yada and I was trying to contrast with that sentiment since I also expect underappreciation for that kind of post.
Since posting it on my profile, my karma has uniformly risen when I log in. Hypothesis: people are moderating their down-karma-ing because they may think they've fallen for a bit of bait to expose their irrationality to me and the wider community
5. Political infiltration
The problem with always being a conformist is that when you try to change the system from within, it's not you who changes the system; it's the system that will eventually change you
A few years ago I joined my country's conservative political party/right wing party (the Government party too) with the intention of promoting reason and evidence-based policy to turn it around. It's aweful, difficult work. And, someone with that mindset can't get elected without sacrificing the social circle of people who are actually like-minded too them since those people would think you have such different values. That's unacceptable even to me. Note: I am not left or right wing, I am a radical centrist.
Entryism and branch stacking has been show to work in history. However, I reckon deep-cover infiltration by lone wolves is extremely difficult pschologically.
6. Misc
Turn your fear of imposing, into a fear of beholding, into no fear at all!
Recently I didn't know how to choose between two options. A wise friend prompted me with the question: what is the difference between them to you
worrying about something that you know how to deal with is futile since you can/have done all you can, and worrying about something you don't know how to deal with is futile as the situation can be changed
EA's, what do you think about the is-ought problem
Death or deprivation of liberty? If the density of tobacco retail outlets is not associated with tobacco related harms then regulatory policies operationalising that are depriving retailers of the liberty to set up shop where they like. If it is associated with tobacco related harms, inaction will spell death and disease for smokers and those around them.
Judgements - practice pereception: 'we have one mind, and if we teach it to judge others then we are teaching our minds to be equally as judgemental to ourselves. Our perception of the world around us can be more telling about who we are inside than anything else. Practice being non-judgemnetal. - diagram on 'true optimism'
Don't Buddhist/Hindu monks 'cling' to their monastic vowes, ironically?
I wonder how propanolol affects psychopaths and scrupolotes?
Ever get asked if your an introvert or extavert? I iidentify as an 'ambivert':
Put simply: ambiverts have the personality qualities of both extraverts and introverts. Ambiverts display these qualities at different times and have been described as socially bilingual, adapting successfully and easily to different situations and contexts. Ambiverts are socially and emotionally flexible.
In a recent study of the correlation between extroversion and income in software sales, contrary to popular expectation (that extraverts are the best salespeople), ambiverts turned out to be the most successful.
The ambivert advantage stems from the tendency to be assertive and enthusiastic enough to persuade and close, but at the same time, listening carefully to customers and avoiding the appearance of being overly confident or excited - Professor Adam Grant
I take a long-term view
Does 'take' mean that it's something you do compulsively, or aren't flexible about it?
I keep quiet about my strengths
What's desirable here?
I enjoy bargaining with someone
internal hassle for the company, external utility
I favour well proven methods
What's desirable here?
I am generally free from tension
what's desirable here?
I am interested in the welfare of others
desirable?
It also got me thinking about the way answers to multiple choice questions are generated. It seems they identify the answer, then present alternative options that have elements of the correct answers in different dimensions. The problem is then that I can simply identify the most common feature after parsing the answers for their dimensions, and that's likely to be the right answer. I don't know if anyone has stumbled upon this before, but it's part of how me, someone incredible stupid, has managed to get through a graduate worldclass science education. If you know any other hacks like this please share!
Logical abstract reasoning quizes 'what comes next in the series' seem like a great way to train potential testee's in the gambler's fallacy...
From experience and validation in this video DO NOT USE A TRIMMER ON YOUR GROIN OR SHAVE YOUR BUTT CHEEKS, IT WILL GET CUT.
‘Be confident - 'It is your beliefs about the importance of what other people think about you that makes the difference. Fear of public speaking has more to do with the fear of being negatively judged by others than anything to do with the fact itself"
-Dr. Gwendoline Smith, clinical psychologist’
Thanks for the writeup.
Since posting it on my profile, my karma has uniformly risen when I log in. Hypothesis: people are moderating their down-karma-ing because they may think they've fallen for a bit of bait to expose their irrationality to me and the wider community
I predict that this isn't what is happening. I think it is either
or both.
Notes for future OT posters:
1. Please add the 'open_thread' tag.
2. Check if there is an active Open Thread before posting a new one. (Immediately before; refresh the list-of-threads page before posting.)
3. Open Threads should be posted in Discussion, and not Main.
4. Open Threads should start on Monday, and end on Sunday.