Is that a critique of expected utility maximization in general, or are you saying that concave functions of wealth aren't risk-averse enough?
Is it an observation that expected utility maximization does not include risk management for free, just because it's "utility".
If it's worth saying, but not worth its own post (even in Discussion), then it goes here.
Notes for future OT posters:
1. Please add the 'open_thread' tag.
2. Check if there is an active Open Thread before posting a new one. (Immediately before; refresh the list-of-threads page before posting.)
3. Open Threads should be posted in Discussion, and not Main.
4. Open Threads should start on Monday, and end on Sunday.