entirelyuseless comments on Counterfactual Mugging Alternative - Less Wrong

-1 Post author: wafflepudding 06 June 2016 06:53AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (23)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: entirelyuseless 12 June 2016 01:19:38PM 0 points [-]

I would pay Omega in the counterfactual mugging, but I would not pay here.

The reason is that in the counterfactual mugging case, I would want to be the sort of person who pays when they get offered a deal like that.

Here, I would not want to be the sort of person who pays to fight an infallible prophecy.

However, I would want to be the sort of person who pays to fight a non-infallible prophecy, so I would be happy to precommit to pay in non-infallible prophecy situations.

Comment author: wafflepudding 13 June 2016 06:38:59AM 0 points [-]

The kind of person who pays to fight an infallible prophecy is the same kind of person to whom infallible prophecies are given 50% less often. In this case.