Comment author:ChristianKl
09 October 2016 08:06:07PM
1 point
[-]
about the problems with wikipedia
The problem that Wikipedia adopts standards from modern evidence-based medicine?
It's better to read a meta-analysis from Cochrane (which is a secondary source) than reading various papers that make statements about what a drug did that might not replicate.
= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
Comments (32)
The problem that Wikipedia adopts standards from modern evidence-based medicine? It's better to read a meta-analysis from Cochrane (which is a secondary source) than reading various papers that make statements about what a drug did that might not replicate.