Comment author:MrMind
10 October 2016 07:24:07AM
*
0 points
[-]
QBism is very interesting, but still lacks a lot of foundations for it to be taken seriously as a mainstream interpretation: why SIC-POVMs should be preferred? What they can tell us about the ontology of quantum mechanics? Do they exists in all dimensions? How are they related to the Heisenberg picture?
= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
Comments (32)
QBism is very interesting, but still lacks a lot of foundations for it to be taken seriously as a mainstream interpretation: why SIC-POVMs should be preferred? What they can tell us about the ontology of quantum mechanics? Do they exists in all dimensions? How are they related to the Heisenberg picture?