Less Wrong is a community blog devoted to refining the art of human rationality. Please visit our About page for more information.

Vaniver comments on LW 2.0 Strategic Overview - Less Wrong

47 Post author: Habryka 15 September 2017 03:00AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (294)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Vaniver 19 September 2017 06:34:40PM 0 points [-]

Vaniver, I sympathize with the desire to automate figuring out who experts are via point systems

To be clear, in this scheme whether or not someone had access to the expert votes would be set by hand.

Comment author: Lumifer 19 September 2017 07:42:31PM 0 points [-]

What is going to be the definition of "an expert" in LW 2.0?

Comment author: gjm 19 September 2017 10:26:35PM 0 points [-]

From context, it's clearly (conditional on the feature being there at all) "someone accepted by the administrators of the site as an expert". How they make that determination would be up to them; I would hope that (again, conditional on the thing happening at all) they would err on the side of caution and accept people as experts only in cases where few reasonable people would disagree.

Comment author: Lumifer 20 September 2017 12:28:23AM 0 points [-]

"All animals are equal... " X-)

The issue is credibility.