conchis comments on Post Your Utility Function - Less Wrong

28 Post author: taw 04 June 2009 05:05AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (273)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: conchis 06 June 2009 04:19:20PM *  1 point [-]

This is a "does the tree make a sound" argument, and I'm on the, "no it doesn't" side, due to using a definition of "sound" that means "the representation of audio waves within a human nervous system". You are on the "of course it makes a sound" side, because your definition of sound is "pressure waves in the air."

I've been trying to be on the "it depends on your definition and my definition sits within the realm of acceptable definitions" side. Unfortunately, whether this is what you intend or not, most of your comments come across as though you're on the "it depends on the definition, and my (PJ's) defintion is right and yours is wrong" side, which is what seems to be getting people's backs up.

Comment author: Vladimir_Nesov 06 June 2009 04:29:58PM 0 points [-]

This confusion is dissolved in the post Disputing Definitions.

Comment author: conchis 06 June 2009 04:32:50PM *  0 points [-]

Which confusion? I didn't think I was confused. Now I'm confused about whether I'm confused. ;)

Comment author: Vladimir_Nesov 06 June 2009 04:40:14PM 0 points [-]

You mentioned this confusion as possibly playing a role in you and Eby talking past each other, the ambiguous use of the word "utility".

Comment author: conchis 06 June 2009 04:59:44PM *  1 point [-]

OK, cool. Now, given that we've already identified that, what does Disputing Definitions tell us that we don't already know?