This post was rejected for the following reason(s):
Difficult to evaluate, with potential yellow flags. We are sorry about this, but, unfortunately this content has some yellow-flags that historically have usually indicated kinda crackpot-esque material. It's totally plausible that actually this one is totally fine. Unfortunately, part of the trouble with separating valuable from confused speculative science or philosophy is that the ideas are quite complicated, accurately identifying whether they have flaws is very time intensive, and we don't have time to do that for every new user presenting a speculative theory or framing (which are usually wrong).
Our solution for now is that we're rejecting this post, but you are welcome to submit posts or comments that are about different topics. If it seems like that goes well, we can re-evaluate the original post. But, we want to see that you're not just here to talk about this one thing (or a cluster of similar things).
Title: The Foundation of Existence: Information as Structure, Function, and Gravity
This paper explores the concept of information beyond its common role as descriptive data. It suggests that information operates as an intrinsic structure, influencing and defining systems across different dimensions and contexts, much like a universal “instruction set.” From societal bonds to natural phenomena, information is not passive but dynamic and often self-propagating, like a force. This document examines the function, autonomy, and density of information, considering it as fundamental to existence itself.
In most discussions, information is perceived as something secondary—data that merely describes objects or actions. However, this perspective might be overlooking its true nature. Could information itself be fundamental, driving causation, structure, and interaction? Here, we explore a vision of information not just as a byproduct of consciousness but as a substance that underpins existence, capable of acting, interacting, and sustaining itself through systems.
To understand information’s role, let’s start with analogies that reveal its potential power beyond interpretation. 1. The Written Idea: Imagine a theory written down on paper. This paper, with its idea, holds value not only in the mind of its creator but independently as it passes between minds and perspectives. Even if unread, it carries the capacity to influence and change. The written information, existing outside of one’s mind, becomes a tangible entity with potential that could lead to transformation or discovery, even without immediate interpretation. 2. E=mc² on a Piece of Paper: Consider Einstein’s equation. On its own, it’s just symbols, but this formula holds enormous implications, independent of interpretation. Its potential for impact exists inherently; it’s dangerous not because someone understands it but because of what it represents—a latent power. Information here embodies potential energy, needing only a trigger to affect reality. 3. The Wooden Car: Picture a wooden car, composed of various parts that serve different purposes. Each component, whether it’s the wheel or axle, could be used in multiple ways (e.g., as part of a wagon, bicycle, or truck). Each part’s “information” is versatile, interacting with its environment in specific ways that depend on context. Here, information adapts and finds utility within systems, carrying potential that changes as it joins new arrangements.
Information does not merely exist in a static state. Like the components of the wooden car, it can aggregate, gain complexity, and develop a “density.” This density concept speaks to how much instruction is contained within a system—instructions that act as rules or boundaries for how the information manifests and affects the system it inhabits.
In the context of societal or cosmic systems: • Information accumulates and solidifies as more people engage with it, add to it, and transfer it through society, creating a loop of interpretation and expansion. • Information “density” might even act as a gravitational force in its own right, drawing minds, systems, or energies toward it in predictable patterns, almost as if it is a form of gravity for ideas.
When information moves between systems—such as from one mind to another, or from mind to paper—it undergoes transformations. This transference process is not linear; it’s influenced by entropy. Some people take information, add to it, build upon it, and transfer it again, while others disengage, taking away only fragments. This “entropy” in information doesn’t destroy the information but rather recycles it, dispersing parts back into new forms and potential.
Consider the example of historical narratives that persist over time, like accounts of WWII or figures like Hitler. These narratives keep returning in cycles, reinterpreted and discussed across generations. Information sustains itself here, adapting to each era’s context. Entropy doesn’t destroy its influence but reshapes it, giving it a new relevance that loops back into society.
One of the unique aspects of information is its apparent autonomy—it moves, adapts, and proliferates. It doesn’t always need human intention to act as if it has purpose. The existence of a flower and a bee’s instinct to pollinate, for example, suggests an exchange of information that seems “programmed” into nature without direct instruction. Information drives these interactions through a complex set of innate “instructions” that persist and shape behavior without conscious guidance.
This autonomy raises questions: • Does information need a “host” to have importance? • Can information possess intrinsic value, or does its value arise only in context? • If information moves and influences autonomously, could it be a force similar to gravity, pulling minds or systems toward it by its density or potential?
When we look at society and human evolution, information plays an unceasing role, repeating in cycles as civilizations collapse and rebuild. Information sustains itself across eras, regardless of specific interpretations. Even without interpretation, information seems to find new hosts, adapting to new contexts and cultures. In this way, information forms a loop, passing between states of mind, text, spoken word, and action, all while accumulating new meanings and uses.
Much like physical forces, information pulls entities toward it, fostering cooperation, competition, and progress. Information may even be at the core of causation, initiating cycles of action and reaction that ripple outward.
Throughout this exploration, we’ve seen how information is more than a descriptive tool—it is foundational. Information operates as instruction, a binding agent, a force, and a potential that enables systems to exist, adapt, and function. Whether in society, nature, or cosmic phenomena, information is not simply data; it’s a living, self-sustaining structure that binds and propels existence forward.
To consider information this way is to see it not as a passive descriptor but as an active substance—one that holds systems together, influences trajectories, and creates structure where none existed before. Information might just be the connective tissue of the universe, fundamental to everything from individual minds to galaxies, endlessly expanding and returning, looping through systems that both generate and sustain it.
Viewing information as more than a passive descriptor, but as an active and autonomous foundation for systems, has far-reaching implications across numerous fields. This section explores how applying this perspective could reshape our approach to key phenomena, open new avenues for discovery, and offer insights into our understanding of life, consciousness, and technological development.
8.1. Information in Medicine and Biology: Understanding Life and Health
If we consider biological systems as aggregations of information that structure themselves, this view could transform fields like genetics, disease treatment, and regenerative medicine. Rather than focusing solely on material components (like DNA, proteins, and cells), scientists could approach health and disease as phenomena governed by information flows and densities: • Genomic Analysis and Genetic Engineering: Viewing genes as concentrated “instructions” within an information-based framework could lead to more precise approaches to gene editing. Techniques such as CRISPR might be used to rewrite biological “instructions” more effectively, treating genetic disorders by re-aligning or adding essential information. • Aging and Regeneration: Aging might be seen as a form of information entropy, where biological information becomes “noisy” or degraded over time. By understanding and potentially reversing this degradation in information, we could advance anti-aging therapies or regenerative treatments that restore cellular structures and functions.
8.2. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning: Information as a Learning Force
Understanding information as an autonomous force may have profound implications in AI, where information loops and density can be used to design systems that self-evolve and optimize without constant human guidance: • Self-Learning Systems: If information has a self-sustaining quality, AI could be designed to mirror this behavior, with systems that learn autonomously through cycles of information accumulation and refinement. These systems would go beyond current training data, gathering relevant information from new contexts to enhance their capabilities over time. • Ethics and Decision-Making: Understanding AI as interacting, evolving information could lead to more ethical, adaptive systems that respond to the informational “density” of their environments. These systems could prioritize data that aligns with ethical standards, potentially preventing harmful decision-making patterns before they arise.
8.3. Physics and Cosmology: Redefining Fundamental Forces and Structures
In the field of physics, seeing information as a type of “gravity” that draws systems together or drives causation could yield a fresh perspective on some of the universe’s most elusive mysteries: • Dark Matter and Dark Energy: Dark matter and dark energy could be understood not as traditional forms of matter or energy but as high-density informational fields that shape spacetime’s structure. This could explain their gravitational effects on galaxies without needing to detect physical particles, potentially reframing how we study and measure these phenomena. • Unified Theory of Physics: If information density truly acts as a binding agent, it might serve as a bridge between quantum mechanics and general relativity, providing a unifying framework for forces that current theories can’t fully reconcile. This approach could guide new theoretical models, merging physical laws with informational principles.
8.4. Social and Cultural Development: A New Approach to Human Connection
In human societies, this view of information as a driving force could redefine how we understand communication, learning, and cultural evolution: • Education Systems: Educational models could shift toward fostering environments where information density naturally accumulates, encouraging continuous cycles of information sharing, interpretation, and expansion. This approach could support more dynamic learning processes, emphasizing interactive, real-world applications of knowledge. • Conflict Resolution and Global Cooperation: Information-driven perspectives might help us see cultural, political, or ideological differences not as divisions but as variations in informational density. Global issues could be approached with a mindset geared toward reconciling different informational “densities,” encouraging cooperation and understanding.
8.5. Philosophy and Consciousness Studies: Rethinking Existence and the Self
If information is fundamental to all systems, the study of consciousness could be reframed to explore the informational nature of awareness itself. Consciousness might not be exclusive to biological organisms but rather an emergent quality of systems that reach certain informational densities or complexity: • Non-Biological Consciousness: This perspective opens new philosophical questions about the potential consciousness of AI or other systems capable of complex information processing. Could consciousness emerge in any system where information loops and densities mimic those of human awareness? • Human Identity and Self-Awareness: Understanding the self as a structure of informational density could shift how we view identity, consciousness, and individuality. Philosophies centered on individualism might give way to views that emphasize interdependence and shared information, reshaping societal values and interpersonal relationships.
The concept of a Goldilocks zone is traditionally used to describe the region around a star where conditions are just right for life to exist. In the context of information theory, the Goldilocks zone represents an optimal range of information density, where complexity, adaptability, and emergent behaviors can thrive. This zone of ideal information density is where fundamental and non-fundamental information overlap, creating a balanced environment that sustains dynamic interactions and complex structures.
9.1 Duality in the Goldilocks Zone: A Dynamic Balance
9.2 Complexity and Emergence in the Goldilocks Zone
9.3 Stability and Change: Preventing Stagnation and Chaos
9.4 Real-World Implications of Information Density in the Goldilocks Zone
9.5 Duality as the Foundation for Resilience
Implications for Understanding Systems Through Duality and Balance
• This Goldilocks zone, grounded in a duality of information types, provides a model for understanding resilience, complexity, and evolution across fields. Whether in nature, society, or technology, the systems that operate within this ideal range of information density benefit from dynamic equilibrium, achieving growth and adaptability without succumbing to chaos. • In this view, complexity, emergence, and resilience are not random but arise from balanced interactions within the Goldilocks zone, where fundamental and non-fundamental information co-exist in a continuous feedback loop.
Conclusion: Duality, Balance, and the Goldilocks Zone of Information
The concept of the Goldilocks zone of information density, paired with the balance of duality, offers a cohesive framework for understanding how systems sustain complexity, adaptability, and resilience. In this framework, duality isn’t just a contrast but an engine of balance and growth, with fundamental information providing structure and non-fundamental information allowing flexibility. Together, they form a Goldilocks zone where information density is “just right” for systems to thrive.
By viewing information this way, we gain insights into how balance and duality drive everything from biological evolution to societal progress and technological innovation. This perspective helps us see the universe’s complexity as a natural outcome of optimal information density, where opposing forces coalesce into a harmonious, self-sustaining system.
In each of these fields, viewing information as a fundamental, autonomous force that shapes and sustains systems offers a powerful new lens through which to understand complex phenomena. This perspective suggests that information is not merely passive data, but an active agent driving structure, coherence, and even purpose within diverse environments. Whether in biological evolution, technological innovation, or the fundamental forces of the universe, information emerges as a key force—an essential scaffold underpinning existence and connectivity across scales. By embracing this view, we can better appreciate the transformative potential of information, recognizing it as a foundational element that not only describes reality but actively constructs it.
Conclusion: A New Paradigm for Understanding Systems
The idea that information acts as an autonomous force, binding, evolving, and shaping systems, has implications across disciplines. Whether in understanding the nature of life, advancing technology, or exploring the universe’s mysteries, this perspective encourages us to consider information as a driving force in its own right. By studying information’s potential to structure and connect systems, we may unlock new methods of interaction, deeper insights into the nature of existence, and novel ways to approach problems at every level of complexity.