You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

wedrifid comments on Vegetarianism - Less Wrong Discussion

29 Post author: Raemon 24 December 2010 04:57AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (165)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: wedrifid 26 December 2010 10:11:54AM 1 point [-]

Ridiculous subsidies to the agricultural industry is not a worldwide phenomenon.

What I hear is that it's water prices- if they were allowed to float

Pun intended? (Incidentally the prices are allowed to float here.)

Comment author: Vaniver 26 December 2010 10:40:40AM 0 points [-]

Ridiculous subsidies to the agricultural industry is not a worldwide phenomenon.

Lucky! Are you outside the OECD? I haven't looked into it heavily, but I was under the impression that all of those countries had rather massive agricultural supports.

Comment author: wedrifid 26 December 2010 12:37:33PM 1 point [-]

Lucky!

Given that I mentioned my background I assume you mean lucky for everyone else. Subsidies may not be efficient but the actual recipients tend to benefit. More government based income would have been handy.

Are you outside the OECD? I haven't looked into it heavily, but I was under the impression that all of those countries had rather massive agricultural supports.

New Zealand then Australia (here) are the most efficient agricultural producers in the OECD in terms of Producer Subsidy Estimate (PSE). About one fifth of the average. We tend to be the ones bitching about subsidies (and tariffs). Their impact on us is primarily to damage our export market.