You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

lukeprog comments on Bring Back the Sequences? - Less Wrong Discussion

44 Post author: Alexandros 07 March 2011 07:21AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (37)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: lukeprog 07 March 2011 11:23:10PM 3 points [-]

Note that I am already systematically blogging through every single Eliezer post. Here is the latest.

Comment author: orthonormal 08 March 2011 03:17:13PM 0 points [-]

What do you think about cross-posting them here on the main page?

Comment author: lukeprog 08 March 2011 06:22:58PM 3 points [-]

I don't think that is wanted...

Comment author: jimrandomh 07 March 2011 11:36:40PM *  0 points [-]

And for anyone starting from the beginning, here is the index. I notice it's fallen behind - the posts are up to #19 while the index has links up to 11.

Following links from Luke's posts is probably a better way to read Eliezer's posts than the Sequences page on the LW wiki is, because of the summaries, and because many of the best articles are one-offs that didn't fit into the "sequences" classification. (Though it does have the disadvantage of not including other authors, some of whom do feature on the Sequences page. Luke, perhaps when Reading Yudkowsky starts nearing the end, you'll continue with Reading Yvain Et Al?)

Comment author: lukeprog 08 March 2011 01:51:54AM 2 points [-]

Yeah, I only update the index every now and then.

The series won't include the other posters (I know this because I've actually finished writing the sequence (62 posts total, if I recall), but I haven't published them all yet).

Comment author: orthonormal 08 March 2011 03:14:36PM 2 points [-]

You wrote them that far in advance of your publishing schedule? Whatever anti-akrasia drug you're on, I'd like some...