You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

rwallace comments on Climate change: existential risk? - Less Wrong Discussion

6 Post author: katydee 06 May 2011 06:19AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (25)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: rwallace 06 May 2011 04:18:19PM 2 points [-]

As long as we're talking about, as you say, significant help rather than solving the whole problem, about what can be done without having full natural language - then I think this is one of the more promising areas of AI research for the next couple of decades.

I talked a few months ago to somebody who's doing biomedical research - one of the smartest guys I know - asking what AI might be able to do to make his job easier, and his answer was that the one thing likely to be feasible in the near future that would really help would be better text mining, something that could do better than just keyword matching for e.g. flagging papers likely to be relevant to a particular problem.