You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

ciphergoth comments on Martinenaite and Tavenier on cryonics - Less Wrong Discussion

17 Post author: ciphergoth 04 August 2011 07:39AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (40)

Comments (40)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: ciphergoth 05 August 2011 07:11:27PM 5 points [-]

I responded:

Thank you so much for taking the time to reply. I'd rather have a discussion where others can benefit than in private; would you consider adding this as a comment on my blog, or in some other public forum (eg [this post])? Or if not, do I have your permission to share this reply with others?

Whether or not you decide to take part in further public discussion on this issue, you have advanced the debate far beyond what any other critic of cryonics has achieved, so thank you!

Comment author: ciphergoth 05 August 2011 07:11:52PM 5 points [-]

Yes, of course you can share our reply. We noticed from the comments that there appears to be a confusion about the opponent group mentioned in the acknowledgments part. The project work is organized in way that each group with their individual project is assigned as an opponent to the other group, so as to comment on the development of the project and help to improve it. Our opponent group had their own project that was not related to ours.

Regards, Evelina and Juliette

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit