You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Bill_McGrath comments on Knox and Sollecito freed - Less Wrong Discussion

26 Post author: komponisto 03 October 2011 08:24PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (114)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Bill_McGrath 04 October 2011 12:44:59AM 4 points [-]

In addition, it could be that people see the foreign press's interest in the case, and their support for Knox, as an unfair influence on the case, and they are protesting the court being swayed by the media.

Comment author: FiftyTwo 04 October 2011 12:47:46AM 1 point [-]

Interesting, but surely if they were making a principled point about media interference in general they wouldn't have booed the verdict? As the media interference had already happened the result was irrelevant.

Comment author: Normal_Anomaly 04 October 2011 02:15:28AM 6 points [-]

Since the media was interfering in favor of the verdict that actually happened, the verdict is evidence that the court was swayed by the media. They may be (or believe they are) protesting the court's "caving to media pressure" or some such.

Comment author: Bill_McGrath 04 October 2011 10:27:41PM 1 point [-]

Yeah, that was kinda what I meant. Also, I wouldn't assume they're thinking particularly rationally!

Comment author: Normal_Anomaly 06 October 2011 01:05:31AM 0 points [-]

Also, I wouldn't assume they're thinking particularly rationally!

Nor would I.