You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

beoShaffer comments on Rationality Verification Opportunity? - Less Wrong Discussion

0 Post author: beoShaffer 15 December 2011 10:11PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (14)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: beoShaffer 15 December 2011 11:01:51PM 1 point [-]

Almost every sentence could be improved. Any specifics?

Comment author: Incorrect 15 December 2011 11:41:21PM *  3 points [-]

My writing skills are also lacking but I'll give it a shot…

Does the start of a new sequence present a way around this for that sequence's content?

The publishing of a sequence with new material may present an opportunity to perform rationality tests without the aforementioned difficulties.

The necessity and viability of having additional experimental controls, like a control group that just reports the measures, without reading the sequence will vary between sequences. But I think we will generally be fine with a simple before and after picture.

Whether additional experimental controls are necessary and/or viable will vary between sequences. For example, a control group could report their measurements without reading the sequence. Regardless, I think it is generally adequate to simply compare individual's measurements from before and after reading the sequence.

I guess I invoke Crocker's rules as well. Although, I think my sentences may be even worse…

Comment author: beoShaffer 16 December 2011 12:41:00AM 0 points [-]

Changed

The necessity and viability of having additional experimental controls will vary between sequences. For example, we could use a control group that doesn't read the sequence, or reads an alternate version while still filling out the same measures. But I think we will generally be fine with a simple before and after picture.

To a new version of my own. Also considered changing it to:

The necessity and viability of having additional experimental controls will vary between sequences. For example, we could use a control group that doesn't read the sequence, or reads an alternate version while still filling out the same measures. But I think we will generally be fine with a simple before and after picture.

Any advice on which is better?