You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Incorrect comments on Rationality Verification Opportunity? - Less Wrong Discussion

0 Post author: beoShaffer 15 December 2011 10:11PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (14)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Incorrect 16 December 2011 03:07:02AM 0 points [-]
Comment author: Antisuji 16 December 2011 06:44:53AM *  0 points [-]

I apologize for being snarky. I am aware of the usage, though I am more familiar with the form in which the asterisk comes at the beginning of the line. I always assumed that the construction came from the way asterisks are used in footnotes, though of course I could be wrong about that. I had not thought to look at the Wikipedia page, so thanks for the link.

Perhaps I should have said that the use of asterisks as a correction marker is in a lower register than I am used to seeing on LW, at least to my eyes. It is fine for IM conversation (though it still grates a little*) but less so for a non-real-time format where you have the luxury of editing. I'll acknowledge that I am at 31 on the older side for this forum and so possibly not fully au courant.

[Edited for formatting.]


* Which I'm trying to get over. I expect it annoys me for the same reason ending rants with "/rant" does, though on a smaller scale.

Comment author: Incorrect 16 December 2011 07:25:53AM 1 point [-]

It is fine for IM conversation (though it still grates a little*) but less so for a non-real-time format where you have the luxury of editing.

I was correcting the original poster, not myself.