You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

NancyLebovitz comments on An argument that animals don't really suffer - Less Wrong Discussion

6 Post author: Solvent 07 January 2012 09:07AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (86)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 07 January 2012 10:09:31PM 10 points [-]

In fact, I assume that most people would feel some mild aversion to animal "cruelty" even if they knew with certainty that the animals in question lack sensory awareness, because our evolved intuitions cannot be overridden without some effort.

There's a lot of cultural variation there-- the animal fights in the Roman coliseum, bull-fighting,, and bear-baiting are all examples of culturally supported use of animal suffering as part of entertainment.

Comment author: Solvent 08 January 2012 03:37:10AM 3 points [-]

Plus the infamous cat-burning in Paris.

Comment author: wedrifid 08 January 2012 05:13:55AM -2 points [-]

Cat's? They burned cats? Why on earth would they bother burning cats? It's witches, wood or nothing!