= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
pedanterrific comments on Empiricism in Gameplay - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (32)
If it had said "prey", not "threat", I wouldn't have wasted three minutes staring after I found it. I kept expecting a cleverly camouflaged guy with a rifle, or something.
I agree - one wolf (if that is a red wolf, and not a fox) isn't much of a threat if you know what you're doing, and I do - but back in the ancestral environment they might not have learned fear of humans, so it could be enough of a threat to earn the word. Even if it's a threat you can dispose of, you still must attend to it.
If it's a fox, you're perfectly safe, of course, unless it's rabid.
You eat carnivores‽
Everyone knows carnivore blood is the tastiest.