You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Mitchell_Porter comments on Thwarting a Catholic conversion? - Less Wrong Discussion

8 Post author: Jay_Schweikert 18 June 2012 04:26PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (201)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Mitchell_Porter 20 June 2012 11:17:37AM 1 point [-]

I don't think the conversion will last.

Comment author: ciphergoth 08 January 2014 01:00:30PM 2 points [-]

I think over 18 months counts as lasting.

Comment author: ciphergoth 21 June 2012 04:55:16PM 2 points [-]

I think the downvote here is a little harsh. Mitchell is sticking his neck out here by making a prediction. I almost think he should offer a bet, but I'm not convinced about the ethics of betting on ordinary people's choices where they can see...

Comment author: Mitchell_Porter 21 June 2012 10:05:52PM 0 points [-]

I thought the downvote (I only saw one) might have come from someone who approved of Leah's conversion.

Comment author: wedrifid 21 June 2012 04:58:54PM 0 points [-]

It is. (Upvoted both his comments.)

Comment author: wedrifid 20 June 2012 11:18:59AM 0 points [-]

I don't think the conversion will last.

How confident are you? How long?

Comment author: Mitchell_Porter 20 June 2012 11:28:19AM *  0 points [-]

Confidence is low. But I give it six months. ETA: The reason is that she's a rationalist, not a mysterian. She's been seduced by Catholic metaphysics and her private mysticism, but the intellectual baggage of Catholic doctrine is what ought to kill it for her in the end. Her day job is public health. Will she really be willing to believe that a young girl in Boston had her liver healed because Edith Stein interceded from beyond the grave?