You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Vladimir_Nesov comments on Scholarship: how to tell good advice from bad advice? - Less Wrong Discussion

11 Post author: ChrisHallquist 29 June 2012 02:13AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (34)

Comments (34)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Vladimir_Nesov 29 June 2012 01:58:45PM *  3 points [-]

Anybody who actually cares enough about something to go through the trouble of writing it up ... is going to be emotionally invested in their work and writings. So my best advice is to assume from the beginning that it is overstated, and consider a weaker version, or a charitable interpretation, of their claims.

As someone who cares a lot about accuracy, I feel that you are overstating this point. ("Most people" in place of "Anybody" seems more plausible.)

Comment author: handoflixue 29 June 2012 07:56:32PM 0 points [-]

I read that as "take as a starting point, the assumption that the idea is overstated" - it's simply a base assumption, if you lack any further information. If you know you're dealing with someone who highly values accuracy, then you can rely on that information. But it's not a good default assumption to assume people value accuracy highly (except possibly in certain highly-specialized sub-cultures)

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit