Hank, I'm sorry - I was a little too harsh. My general difficulty is that I don't think you endorse what Jack called universal relativism. If you don't, then

I addressed this previously, explaining that I am using 'objective' and 'subjective' in the common sense way of 'mind-independent' or 'mind-dependent'

and

I don't understand why people insist on equating 'objective morality' with something magically universal.

don't go well together.

It is the case that objective != universal, but objective things tend to cause universality. If you have a reason why universality isn't caused by objective fact in this case, you should state it.