You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

evand comments on Scott Aaronson's cautious optimism for the MWI - Less Wrong Discussion

5 Post author: calef 19 August 2012 02:35AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (70)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: evand 19 August 2012 03:20:37AM 8 points [-]

I think the short version is that you don't need math that covers the wavefunction collapse, because you don't need the wave function to collapse.

For a longer version, you'd need someone who knows more QM than I do.