You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Nisan comments on Open Thread, October 1-15, 2012 - Less Wrong Discussion

1 Post author: David_Gerard 01 October 2012 05:54AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (477)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Nisan 02 October 2012 03:29:36AM 0 points [-]

I apologize for accusing you of not reading the post.

I think your sarcastic coffee analogy is not quite apt. Yvain is advocating the status quo, which is more like "There is a ban on coffee from which me and people like me are exempt."

Comment author: [deleted] 02 October 2012 09:21:13AM *  1 point [-]

Yeah, and that kind of people would still use coffee if it were a Schedule IV substance. And I can see no obvious reason why we are in an optimum, where restricting more or fewer stimulants would both be net negatives. (EDIT Actually, before even finishing to read the post, I thought ‘wow -- if what he says about medical students etc. is right, we might want to restrict caffeine! I know I want to become stronger rather than my competition to become weaker, but I don't know if that applies to others, so...’.)

Comment author: shminux 02 October 2012 04:54:55AM 1 point [-]

I have not tried to write a mathematical model (should be reasonably easy), but my intuition tells me that the status quo is an unstable equilibrium. It will likely slide toward more universal acceptance, followed by either legalization or enforced prohibition (like with LSD).

Comment author: [deleted] 02 October 2012 07:16:16PM 0 points [-]

Probably, but that may take decades to happen.