You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Emile comments on Open Thread, December 1-15, 2012 - Less Wrong Discussion

5 Post author: OpenThreadGuy 01 December 2012 05:00AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (177)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Emile 06 December 2012 07:02:14PM 5 points [-]

There can be several ways to get enjoyement out of a roleplaying game:

  • The sheer intellectual challenge of the game (which you can also get from storyless boardgames)

  • Telling or enjoying an interesting story, with interesting situations

  • Escapism - living as someone else, in a different world

These are usually called Gamist, narrativist, Simulationist.

They are not mutually incompatible, and you can indeed have different people around the same table with different tastes / goals. There can be problem when one ruins the story or the believability in order to get a game advantage, and other players were caring about the story etc. - this is when people claim about munchkinry.

But you can still have good game sessions where everybody is a munchkin, or when the rules and DM are good enough so that the player's don't get to choose between a game advantage and an interesting story (for example, I think in most versions of D&D you basically have some points you can only spend on combat-useful stuff (opicking feats or powers), and some points you can only spend on combat-useless stuff (skill points)).

Comment author: blashimov 11 December 2012 04:33:02PM 2 points [-]

Anyone who thinks skill points (or any other character ability) is useless in combat gets an "F" in munchkinry. ;)