You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

MugaSofer comments on What truths are actually taboo? - Less Wrong Discussion

4 Post author: sunflowers 16 April 2013 11:40PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (293)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: MugaSofer 18 April 2013 08:55:36PM -1 points [-]

Really? I've always considered those distinct sounds, but then I read a lot from both sides of the Atlantic as a kid.

Comment author: fortyeridania 28 April 2013 07:45:18AM *  1 point [-]

Here's some evidence.

I think the recordings at those pages are misleading, because they're all from a US speaker. The phonetic markings are what to look at.

Comment author: MugaSofer 29 April 2013 08:40:37AM *  -1 points [-]

Um ... evidence?

er

pronounced: /ɜː/

etymology: copying the sound people make when hesitating.

uh

pronounced: /ʌː/

No listed etymology, but attached to a list of such sounds from various languages.

erm

pronunciation: no phonetic markings listed; recording only.

no etymology listed, but attached to an entirely different list of such sounds in other languages.

um

pronounciation: /ʊm/

etymology:

From Middle English, from Old Norse um, umb (“around, about”), from Proto-Germanic *umbi (“around”), from Proto-Indo-European *ambʰi- (“by, around”). Cognate with Old English ymbe (“around”). More at umbe.

Also, I've ignored the recordings - I actually can't listen to them on this computer - but why would there be a mispronounced pronunciation guide? I mean, wouldn't people who aren't US speakers correct it, if they knew better? I'm not a US speaker, and I would.

ETA: apparently "hum" may come from the old English version of this - from which we also get um and hmm. Or something.