You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

leplen comments on For FAI: Is "Molecular Nanotechnology" putting our best foot forward? - Less Wrong Discussion

48 Post author: leplen 22 June 2013 04:44AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (117)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: leplen 26 June 2013 03:17:41AM 17 points [-]

I will be happy to engage Drexler at length when I get the chance to do so. I have not, in the last 3 days, >>managed to buy the book and go through the physics in detail. I hope that failure is not enough to condemn me as not acting in good faith.

Absolutely not, and I think this occasioned a useful discussion. But if you have a physics or chemistry >background, I for one would greatly appreciate it if you did so (and the Smalley critique, and perhaps >Locklin below) and posted your take. Also you don't need to buy the book, you should be able to get a copy >at any large university library.

Okay. I'll try and do this. I'm mildly qualified; I'm finishing up a Ph.D. in computational materials science. It will take me a little while to make time for it, but it should be fun! Anyone else who is interested in seeing this discussion feel free to encourage me/let me know.

Comment author: asr 26 June 2013 03:33:26AM 6 points [-]

I would be interested to see this.

Comment author: ciphergoth 27 June 2013 08:51:07AM 5 points [-]

I would love to see a critique that started "On page W of X, Drexler proposes Y, but this won't work because Z". Smalley made up a proposal that Drexler didn't make ("fat fingers") and critiqued that. If there's a specific design in Nanosystems that won't work, that would be very informative.

Comment author: Baughn 26 June 2013 02:43:20PM 5 points [-]

I would very much like to see this. Sounds like another discussion-level post would be in order.

Comment author: CarlShulman 26 June 2013 03:20:09AM 4 points [-]

Thanks!