You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Dorikka comments on Open thread, August 19-25, 2013 - Less Wrong Discussion

2 Post author: David_Gerard 19 August 2013 06:58AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (325)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Dorikka 19 August 2013 07:32:07PM *  9 points [-]

Open comment thread:

If it's worth saying, but not worth its own top-level comment in the open thread, it goes here.

(Copied since it was well received last time.)

Comment author: shminux 19 August 2013 08:22:55PM 5 points [-]

What's the name of the bias/fallacy/phenomenon where you learn something (new information, approach, calculation, way of thinking, ...) but after awhile revert to the old ideas/habits/views etc.?

Comment author: RobbBB 20 August 2013 06:12:53AM 10 points [-]

Relapse? Backsliding? Recidivism? Unstickiness? Retrogression? Downdating?

Comment author: shminux 20 August 2013 05:40:52PM *  0 points [-]

Hmm, some of these are good terms, but the issue is so common, I assumed there would be a standard term for it, at least in the education circles.

Comment author: moreati 19 August 2013 09:48:41PM 0 points [-]

I can't think of an academic name, the common phrases in Britain are 'stuck in your ways', 'bloody minded', 'better the the devil you know'.

Comment author: [deleted] 21 August 2013 06:09:19PM 0 points [-]

Depending on what timescales shminux is thinking of as “awhile” (hours or months?), RobbBB's suggestions may be better.

Comment author: Armok_GoB 27 August 2013 07:49:08PM 0 points [-]

Open subcomment subthread:

If it's not worth saying anywhere, it goes here.

Comment author: Dorikka 27 August 2013 11:54:07PM *  0 points [-]

I thought it wasn't necessary to paste the note (not mine) that accompanied the original comment. :P

Regarding the obvious recursion, please note that jokes are generally only funny the first time. :)

Comment author: Armok_GoB 28 August 2013 07:01:50PM 0 points [-]

Hey now, half the joke was sort of original, about the implication of sufficient metaleevels in this direction. :p