= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Locaha comments on Open thread, August 19-25, 2013 - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (325)
The dust speck is just a symbol for the smallest negative utility unit. Just imagine something else.
Oh, I was already aware of that (and this is not just hindsight bias, I remember reading about this today and someone suggested replacing the speck with the smallest actual negative utility unit). This isn't really about the original question anyway. I was just thinking if something that doesn't even register on a conscious level could have negative utility.
I guess anything with a negative cumulative effect.
Imagine the dust specks piling in your eye until they start to interfere with your vision.
Well, yes, but it's one dust speck per person...
And it's entirely possible that utility of dust speck isn't additive. In fact, it's trivially so: one dust speck is fine, a few trillion will do gruesome things to your head.
I'm now thinking of developing a Dust Speck Machine Gun. Or Shotgun, possibly.
Well, I don't see how anything that never registers on any level can have any utility.
But... I dunno. Something that lowers your IQ by 1 point may be something you will never discover, and yet it will cause you negative utility...