= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Vika comments on Instinctive Frequentists, the Outside View, and de-Biasing - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (23)
Downvoted for misrepresenting frequentism, but otherwise a great post. Frequentism does not prohibit assigning probabilities to single events, and approximation of probabilities using counts is not exclusive to frequentist models. The impact of presenting the questions to people using numbers vs percentages has little to do with frequentism, and much more to do with cognitive ease.