You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Dagon comments on A question about utilitarianism and selfishness. - Less Wrong Discussion

-2 Post author: abcd_z 29 September 2013 01:03AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (26)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Dagon 29 September 2013 09:35:13AM 1 point [-]

Yes. You are morally obliged to weigh your desires against the anticipated effects of your actions. However, this isn't usually (for me) a matter of favoring other people over myself, it's more favoring long-term me over short-term me. I want to live in a better world, and that means taking actions that improve it.

Breaking up with someone gently and firmly now is far better than breaking up horribly after years of misery. For both parties, and for both of your future partners. Easy win.

Likewise terminating an employee who's not working out (when that's not likely to change) - it's a long-term win for you, their coworkers (even if they don't know it), and sometimes for the former employee.